Morphological differentiation of Anura (Amphibia) in the late ontogenesis: analysis of Rana temporaria populations from the Carpathian region

[Петренко, Н., В. Пєсков, Є. Улюра. Морфологічна диференціація Anura (Amphibia) у пізньому онтогенезі: аналіз популяцій Rana temporaria з регіону Карпат]

Nina Petrenko  https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3026-8840

Vladimir Peskov https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2389-6546

Eugenia Ulyura  https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2439-4134

National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv, Ukraine)

doi: https://doi.org/10.53452/gb2514

Cite as

Petrenko, N., V. Peskov, E. Ulyura. 2023. Morphological differentiation of Anura (Amphibia) in the late ontogenesis: analysis of Rana temporaria populations from the Carpathian region. GEO&BIO, 25: 176–186. [In Ukrainian, with English summary]

pdf:  pdf

Abstract

The study is devoted to the morphological features of the common frog of the Carpathian region of Ukraine, namely the expression, directionality and structure of sexual differences of this species. The work uses data obtained as a result of the processing of the scientific collection of Rana temporaria (Linnaeus, 1758) from the territory of the Ukrainian Carpathians (Lviv, Ivano-Frankivsk, and Zakarpattia oblasts), which is housed at the National Museum of Natural History, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Kyiv). A total of 381 common frog specimens were studied—233 males (L = 24.6–84.5 mm) and 148 females (L = 23.2–94.2 mm). It is shown that individual differences in linear dimensions and body proportions in a sample of common frog males and females are structured and clearly reflect the morphological differentiation of individuals according to the age criterion. In the late ontogenesis of the common frog, generalised sex-related differences extend with the increasing age of individuals: in juveniles SqMD = 2.36, in subadults SqMD = 4.77, and in adults SqMD = 22.08. At the same time, not only does the expression of sex-related differences increase, but also their orientation changes significantly. According to our data, this year’s juveniles (juvenis) are individuals that did not winter at all (0+). At the same time, males are reliably (t = 4.50; p < 0.001) larger in body length (24.6–37.5 mm; L_mean = 29.87 mm) than females (23.2–32.7 mm; L_mean = 26.40 mm). But already in the group of semi-adult (subadultus) frogs, the orientation of sexual dimorphism in terms of body length changes completely—females are reliably larger than males, which is even more pronounced in adult, sexually mature individuals. Males of tailless amphibians grow and physiologically mature faster than females, so they begin to reproduce 1–2 years earlier. Females, which grow more slowly and mature later, join the reproduction having a larger size and older age. It is shown that sexual differences begin to form in the subadultus group. The generalised differences (SqMD) by sex are significantly smaller than by age. Adult sexually mature females compared to males are characterised by larger values of 18 body parameters, except for shoulder length (H.) and elbow joint diameter (Cr.a.c.), which are most reliably larger in males. These features of the proportions of the limbs provide the male with reliable holding of the female during mating (amplexus).

Key words: common frog, late ontogenesis, morphological differentiation, sex-related differences, intrapopulation differentiation, Carpathian region.

Correspondence to

Eugenia Ulyura; National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine; 15 Bohdan Khmelnytsky Street, Kyiv, 01030 Ukraine; Email: ulyura@ukr.net; orcid: 0000-0002-2439-4134

Article info

Submitted: 18.08.2023. Revised: xx.xx.2023. Accepted: 30.12.2023.

References

Augert, D., P. Joly. 1993. Plasticity of age at maturity between two neighboring populations of the common frog (R. temporaria L.). Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71 (1): 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1139/z93-005

Castanet, J., I. Smirina. 1990. Introduction to the skeletochronological method in amphibians and reptiles. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. Biol., 11: 191–196.

Cogălniceanu, D., R. I. Băncilă, R. Plăiaşu, D. Roşioru, J. Merila. 2017. Small-scale spatial and temporal variation of life-history traits of common frogs (Rana temporaria) in sub-Arctic Finland. Polar Biology, 40: 1581–1592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-017-2081-8

Gibbons, M. M., T. K. McCarthy. 1984. Growth, maturation and survival of frogs R. temporaria L. Holarctic Ecology 7:419–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.1984.tb01143.x

Halafyan, A. A. 2007. STATISTICA 6. Statistical Data Analysis: Textbook. Binom, Moskva, 1–512. [In Russian]

Kabardina, Yu. A. 2002. Formation of interspecies differences in morphometric characteristics of common, Rana temporaria, and moor, Rana arvalis, frogs. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 81 (2): 221–233. [In Russian]

Karl, I., K. Fischer. 2009. Altitudinal and environmental variation in lifespan in Copper butterly Lycaena tityrus. Functional Ecology, 23: 1132–1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01607.x

Kleynenberg, S. E., E. M. Smirina. 1969. On the method of determining the age of amphibians. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 48 (7): 1070–1094. [In Russian]

Kurtiak, F. F., L. V. Krulko. 2008. Diagnosis of species of the genus Rana Linnaeus, 1758 (Amphibia, Anura, Ranidae) from the territory of Transcarpathia. Naukovyi Visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriia Biolohiia, 22: 224–232. [In Ukrainian]

Kuzmin, S. L. 2012. Amphibians of the Former USSR. 2-е ed. Moskva, KMK, 1–370. [In Russian]

Laugen, A. T., A. Laurila, K.I. Jönsson, F. Söderman, J. Merilä 2005. Do common frogs (R. temporaria) follow Bergmann’s rule? Evolutionary Ecology Research, 7: 717–731.

Leclair M.H., R. Jr. Leclair, J. Gallant. 2005. Application of skeletochronology to a population of Pelobates cultripes (Anura: Pelobatidae) from Portugal. Journal of Herpetology, 39: 199–207. https://doi.org/10.1670/174-04A

Lyapkov, S. M. 1997. Variability in growth rates of common frogs (Rana temporaria) and moor frogs (Rana arvalis) in the first years of terrestrial life. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 76 (2): 199–205. [In Russian]

Lyapkov, S. M. 2005. Sexual dimorphism in brown frogs: differences in body size and demographic characteristics. In: Evolutionary Factors in the Formation of the Diversity of the Animal World. КМК, Moskva, 297–310. [In Russian]

McCreary, B., C. A. Pearl, M. J. Adams. 2008. A Protocol for Aging Anurans Using Skeletochronology. U.S. Geological Survey Open File Report, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20081209

Miaud, C., R. Guyétant, J. Elmberg. 1999. Variations in life-history traits in the common frog (R. temporaria, Aphibia: Anura): aliterature review and new data from the French Alps. Journal of Zoology, 249: 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1999.tb01060.x

Patrelle, C., M. B. Hjernquist, A. Laurila, F. Soderman, J. Merila. 2012. Sex differences in age structure, growth rate and body size of common frogs Rana temporaria in the subarctic. Polar Biology, 35: 1505–1513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-012-1190-7

Peskov ,V. N., A. Y. Malyuk, N. A. Petrenko. 2017. Expression, direction and structure of sexual differences in amphibians and reptiles, on example of Rana temporaria Linnaeus, 1758 and Lacerta viridis (Laurenti, 1768). Zbirnyk Prats Zoolohichnoho Muzeiu, (48): 54-69. [In Russian]

Peskov, V. N., N. A. Petrenko, V. Y. Reminnyi. 2019. Size-at-age variability and sexual dimorphism of morphometric characteristics in the late ontogenesis of the marsh frog Pelophylax ridibundus (Anura, Ranidae) from territory of Crimea. Vestnik zoologii, 53 (4): 325–334. https://doi.org/10.2478/vzoo-2019-0031

Peskov, V. N., Y. M. Kotserzhynskaia, V. V. Manylo, E. M. Pysanets. 2004. Morphological differentiation and diagnosis of brown frogs Rana arvalis, R. temporatia and R. dalmatina (Amphibia, Ranidae) from the territory of Ukraine. Vestnik Zoologii, 38 (6) 29-40. [In Russian]

Pysanets, Y. М. 2007. Amphibians of Ukraine (a Guide to Identifying Amphibians of Ukraine and Neighboring Countries). Vydavnytstvo Raievskoho, Kyiv, 1–192. [In Ukrainian]

Pysanets, Y. 2014. Amphibians of Eastern Europe. Part II. Order Tailless. National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, 1–192. [In Ukrainian]

Pysanets, Y., О. Kukushkin. 2016. Amphibians of Crimea. National Museum of Natural History, NAS of Ukraine, Kyiv, 1–320. [In Ukrainian]

Reminnyi, V. Y. 2007. Age structure of the reproductive part of the population of marsh frogs Pelophylax ridibundus (Ranidae Amphibia). Zbirnyk Prats Zoolohichnoho Muzeiu, 39: 63–68. [In Ukrainian]

Szczerbak, N. N., M. I. Scherban. 1980. Аmphibians and Reptilians of Carpathian. Naukova dumka, Kyiv, 1–268. [In Russian]

Shabanov, D. A., A. V. Korshunov, M. A., Kravchenko, E. V. Meleshko, A. V. Shabanova, E. E. Usova. 2014. Intra-population ontogenetic strategies of precocity and stunting: definition using the example of tailless amphibians. Visnyk Kharkivskoho Natsionalnoho Universytetu imeni V. N. Karazina, (1126): 138–147. [In Russian]

Sinsch, U. 2015. Review: Skeletochronological assessment of demographic life-history traits in amphibians. Herpetological Journal, 25: 5–13.

Smirina, E. M. 1980. On the rate of growth and survival of common frogs (Rana temporaria) in the first years of life. Zoologicheskii zhurnal, 12 (59): 1831–1840. [In Russian]

Smirina, E. M. 1989. The method of determining the age of amphibians and reptiles by bone layers. In: Rukovodstvo po Izucheniyu Zemnovodnyih i Presmyikayuschihsya. VII Vsesoyuznaya Gerpetologicheskaya Konferentsiya, 144–153. [In Russian]

Wagner, A., R. Schabetsberger, M. Sztatecsny, R. Kaiser. 2011. Skeletochronology of phalanges underestimates the true age of long-lived Alpine newts (Ichthyosaura alpestris). Herpetological Journal, 21: 145–148.